The House of Representatives has explained why the allegations brought up by the Minority Leader, Ndudi Elumelu, against Isa Ali Pantamin, Minister of Communications and Digital Economy could not be debated during the House plenary  on Wednesday .   

Femi Gbajabiamila, Speaker of the House of Representative, on Thursday explained that though Elumelu brought up the allegations against the Communication Minister in accordance with the House rules, it could not be debated because it was brought under matter of privilege.

He advised other lawmakers to educate their constituents on workings of the House, especially on standing rules.

Gbajabiamila  also urged that journalists covering the House to always report facts.

“As provided for in our rules, matters that come under privilege are not debated. They are not motions. They are not seconded as a motion should.

“I think it behoves on all of us to educate our constituents on such matters. It was not a motion. We noted the privilege. We only followed our rules. It’s important that our constituents get to know. As is the practice, your point of order is noted,” the Speaker said.

Honourable Ahmed Jaha expressed that it was appalling some sections of the media reported Speaker Gbajabiamila shut down a motion brought by Elumelu for suspension of Pantami.

Under Order 6, Rule 1 and 2 of the Standing Orders of the House, which borders on matters of privilege of the individual lawmakers, Jaha noted that there was a complete misrepresentation of what transpired in the Chamber.

He said that “From what happened, this House did not stop any such move. What I know is that the presiding officer only said the order cited was wrong and that the Minority Leader can come through the right order.

“There was no point where this presiding officer stopped the motion (calling) for removal of the Minister.”