Translate:
 
  • Follow Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on YouTube
Friday, 23rd October, 2020
 
 
 
 Nigeria   ::   News
 
36 States challenge presidential order
Sep 28, 2020
Source: CEOAFRICA NEWS: Reported by Blessing Sunday
Nigerian Map
NIGERIA

All the thirty-six Nigerian States went before the Supreme Court in challenge of the Presidential Executive Order No. 00-10 of 2020 signed in the month of May by the President Muhammadu Buhari on the funding of the courts.

The 36 states filed a suit through their respective Attorneys-General, and are seeking an order of the Supreme Court repealing Buhari’s Executive Order for being unconstitutional.

The sole respondent in the suit is the Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami (SAN).

In the suit filed on their behalf by nine Senior Advocates of Nigeria, led by a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Mr Augustine Alegeh (SAN), and six other lawyers, the 36 states explained that Buhari, by virtue of the Executive Order he signed on May 20, 2020, had pushed the Federal Government’s responsibility of funding both the capital and recurrent expenditures of the state high courts, Sharia Court of Appeal and the Customary Court of Appeal, to the state governments.

They further contended that Buhari’s Executive Order No. 00-10 of 2020 was a clear violation of sections 6 and 8(3) of the 1999 Constitution, which make it the responsibility of the Federal Government to fund the listed courts.

The 36 states said they had been funding the capital projects in the listed courts since 2009, and are also praying the Supreme Court to order the Federal Government to make a refund to them.

In their words: “Since the 5th of May 2009, the defendant had not funded the capital and recurrent expenditures of the state high courts, Sharia Court of Appeal and the Customary Court of Appeal of the plaintiffs’ states, apart from paying only the salaries of the judicial officers of the said courts.”

“The plaintiffs’ states have been solely responsible for funding the capital and recurrent expenditures of the state high courts, Sharia Court of Appeal and the Customary Court of Appeal of the plaintiffs’ states, which the defendant has failed and/or refused to fund.”

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
  Headlines (Nigeria):
Read our other news items below...